_______               __                   _______
       |   |   |.---.-..----.|  |--..-----..----. |    |  |.-----..--.--.--..-----.
       |       ||  _  ||  __||    < |  -__||   _| |       ||  -__||  |  |  ||__ --|
       |___|___||___._||____||__|__||_____||__|   |__|____||_____||________||_____|
                                                             on Gopher (inofficial)
   URI Visit Hacker News on the Web
       
       
       COMMENT PAGE FOR:
   URI   Waterfront home price down by 75% as erosion concern washes value away
       
       
        jl2718 wrote 7 hours 45 min ago:
        “Erosion concern” is exactly correct for this particular location
        on this particular island, a place I knew very well. The rising sea
        levels are not particularly concerning in this situation. But why is it
        eroding so fast? Global warming? Maybe, but much more likely it is the
        fact that this once extremely verdant forest island has been shorn down
        to mere grasslands by environmental activists of all people. You see,
        most of that part of the island is owned by the Land Bank, which is a
        conservation trust that levies a 2% tax on every real estate
        transaction, for the stated purpose of purchasing and preserving land
        in its natural state. Well, so it was, but now they’ve gotten into
        the golf business, and their last major purchase was a $9M 8-bedroom
        house for seasonal staff at the golf course. Incidentally, they’ve
        also discovered a rare flower that they’ve never observed to grow in
        the thick brush and tree-cover that naturally grows there. So of course
        they’ve brought over a fleet of earth-shaving leviathan machines to
        fix nature’s mistake. My labyrinth of sandy-foot green running
        tunnels was cut down to awkward winding paths on a plain. The deer
        thinned out, the ground foul disappeared, the armies of migratory birds
        moved on. When the late October hurricanes swooped in on the island,
        you could see the aftermath of dead root systems strewn about the
        beaches, multi-millennial clays beaten back a few feet. It takes a lot
        to get those feet back. Root systems push out into the newly laid sand
        in Spring time to get access to partially-desalinated ocean minerals.
        If enough of them hold on to it together, they can keep it. Erosion is
        exactly the word to understand. It is not the ocean swallowing the
        land, but rather nibbling at it, defenseless, rootless, barren.
       
          Kon-Peki wrote 3 hours 32 min ago:
          > this once extremely verdant forest island
          
          I don’t think you will have many supporters for this claim.
          
          > Nantucket! Take out your map and look at it. See what a real corner
          of the world it occupies; how it stands there, away off shore, more
          lonely than the Eddystone lighthouse. Look at it- a mere hillock, and
          elbow of sand; all beach, without a background. There is more sand
          there than you would use in twenty years as a substitute for blotting
          paper. Some gamesome wights will tell you that they have to plant
          weeds there, they don’t grow naturally; that they import Canada
          thistles; that they have to send beyond seas for a spile to stop a
          leak in an oil cask; that pieces of wood in Nantucket are carried
          about like bits of the true cross in Rome; that people there plant
          toadstools before their houses, to get under the shade in summer
          time; that one blade of grass makes an oasis, three blades in a
          day’s walk a prairie; that they wear quicksand shoes, something
          like Laplander snow-shoes; that they are so shut up, belted about,
          every way inclosed, surrounded, and made an utter island of by the
          ocean, that to the very chairs and tables small clams will sometimes
          be found adhering as to the backs of sea turtles. But these
          extravaganzas only show that Nantucket is no Illinois.
       
        danielfoster wrote 9 hours 20 min ago:
        Here's a more insightful article that shows the extent of the change:
        
   URI  [1]: https://nantucketcurrent.com/real-estate/its-a-gamble-beachfro...
       
        rayiner wrote 12 hours 26 min ago:
        I’m shocked at how many people in Maryland buy waterfront homes at
        sea level. It’s like they don’t believe climate change is
        happening. When we bought our house, we deliberately picked something
        about 20-25 feet above the water. Erosion will eventually still wash
        away the ridge we are on but it’ll take awhile.
       
          everybodyknows wrote 46 min ago:
          In California the people with enough money to buy oceanfront homes
          are, unsurprisingly, expert in working the system.
          
          Their efforts proceed along two fronts:
          
          1. Subverting the Coastal Act through endless lobbying and
          litigation, to allow private or public artificial barriers against
          the sea.
          
          2. Promoting replacement-sand dredging projects, sold as "beach
          replenishment" and charged to the public treasury, of course.
       
            rayiner wrote 3 min ago:
            [delayed]
       
          Yeul wrote 4 hours 25 min ago:
          The Netherlands aside from being Atlantis is also sinking. Nobody is
          worried because the government will fix it.
       
          DSingularity wrote 6 hours 43 min ago:
          Isn’t this a problem that will only affect the inheritance of the
          grandchildren of your grandchildren? I mean how much does erosion
          affect this shoreline in concrete terms? Is it even a few millimeters
          per year?
       
            defrost wrote 6 hours 32 min ago:
            From TFA:
            
                According to Fortune, which cited a report from The Boston
            Globe, the dramatic price decrease was related to an overheating
            planet — in a matter of a few weeks, the shoreline surrounding
            the property lost 70 feet from erosion due to rising seas.
            
            With reference to Maryland :
            
                Shoreline erosion in Maryland has stripped away land and
            sediment, bringing the coastline inland, submerging other areas,
            and putting infrastructure and valuable waterfront property at
            risk. Almost 70 percent of the state’s 7,000 miles of
            shoreline—close to 4,600 miles—is eroding.
            
            ...
            
                While much of the erosion has been caused by rising sea levels,
            diurnal tides, and boat wake, some of it is due  to the surge of
            waves that accompany severe storms. Hurricane Isabel, for example,
            washed away shorelines along the Chesapeake Bay when it made
            landfall in 2003, in addition to causing $84 million in damage to
            shoreline structures.
            
   URI      [1]: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-b...
       
          bdjsiqoocwk wrote 10 hours 17 min ago:
          How long are you guessing?
       
            rayiner wrote 4 hours 50 min ago:
            I’m guessing generations. Were way above expected sea level rise,
            so the biggest worry is about erosion removing soil under the
            foundation until it collapses. The waves don’t hit the ridge
            directly because there’s a beach between us and the water. But
            rain will do it eventually. The property has 70 year old concrete
            retaining walls (partly to hold up the foundation, partly to create
            some terraces) and the one nearest to the beach has collapsed
            completely.
       
        Clubber wrote 12 hours 37 min ago:
        The waterfront homes in my area sure aren't coming down in price.
        They're over the top and rising.
       
       
   DIR <- back to front page