_______               __                   _______
       |   |   |.---.-..----.|  |--..-----..----. |    |  |.-----..--.--.--..-----.
       |       ||  _  ||  __||    < |  -__||   _| |       ||  -__||  |  |  ||__ --|
       |___|___||___._||____||__|__||_____||__|   |__|____||_____||________||_____|
                                                             on Gopher (inofficial)
   URI Visit Hacker News on the Web
       
       
       COMMENT PAGE FOR:
   URI   Birth of 86-DOS
       
       
        aabajian wrote 5 hours 26 min ago:
        The last line is the most interesting, "In October 1980, Microsoft's
        Paul Allen contacted Seattle Computer Products and expressed interest
        in reselling 86-DOS. The first version of 86-DOS licensed to Microsoft
        was 0.3. In July 1981, just a month before IBM PC was announced, 86-DOS
        was sold to Microsoft and renamed to MS-DOS."
        
        IBM reached out to Microsoft sometime in 1980 about an operating
        system, so SCP would've had at least 8 months to look into why
        Microsoft wanted their DOS before selling it entirely to them.
        
        Did Microsoft resell 86-DOS to anybody before changing the name to
        MS-DOS? Did SCP make any effort find out why Microsoft wanted their
        DOS?
       
          slipheen wrote 2 hours 27 min ago:
          It has been reported that IBM made a deal with Microsoft in part
          because the chairman of IBM was friends with Bill Gates’s mother.
          [1] It is likely that no other company could’ve gotten the same
          deal.
          
   URI    [1]: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/05/how-bill-gates-mother-influe...
       
          tonyedgecombe wrote 4 hours 56 min ago:
          > Did SCP make any effort find out why Microsoft wanted their DOS?
          
          We know that if Bill Gates comes calling you should be suspicious. It
          wasn’t such common knowledge back then.
       
        nsxwolf wrote 5 hours 28 min ago:
        I don’t remember anyone saying or writing “eighters” and
        “sixers” back then.
       
          cardiffspaceman wrote 4 min ago:
          I read this notion a while ago, perhaps in IEEE Spectrum or
          something. I didn’t use the terms very much because I didn’t hear
          them.
       
          rbanffy wrote 5 hours 12 min ago:
          Me neither. Could be something local. We didn't have many magazines
          or BBSs to unify informal language.
       
       
   DIR <- back to front page