.-') _      .-') _  
                      ( OO ) )    ( OO ) ) 
          .-----. ,--./ ,--,' ,--./ ,--,'
         '  .--./ |   \ |  |\ |   \ |  |\  
         |  |('-. |    \|  | )|    \|  | ) 
        /_) |OO  )|  .     |/ |  .     |/  
        ||  |`-'| |  |\    |  |  |\    |   
       (_'  '--'\ |  | \   |  |  | \   |
          `-----' `--'  `--'  `--'  `--'
       lite.cnn.com - on gopher - inofficial
       
       
       ARTICLE VIEW: 
       
       Narendra Modi: India’s popular but controversial leader seeking a
       transformative third term
       
       By Rhea Mogul, CNN
       
       Updated: 
       
       3:31 AM EDT, Tue April 16, 2024
       
       Source: CNN
       
       Prime Minister Narendra Modi once famously made a simple election
       promise: “good days are coming.”
       
       To his adoring supporters, it’s a vision of a future now finally
       within reach should Modi and his right-wing Hindu nationalist
       Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secure an emphatic and rare third
       consecutive term at .
       
       At his rallies, tens of thousands gather in near frenzied religious
       devotion in support of a man whose policies they say have transformed
       the lives of ordinary Indians – and helped enshrine the nascent
       promise of social mobility in a country still riven by caste divisions.
       
       Modi projects himself as an outsider from humble origins. Born as the
       son of a tea seller in a small town in Gujarat, he does not fit neatly
       within the often privately educated, resolutely metropolitan,
       English-speaking template set by many previous Indian leaders.
       
       The 73-year-old is single, has no children, and seemingly shuns
       expensive material possessions in favor of a simple, ascetic lifestyle.
       
       And though little is shared about Modi the man – his private life is
       assiduously guarded by a formidable public relations team – his
       persona resonates with many.
       
       His political rise in some ways mirrors India’s own path from a newly
       independent nation freed from the shackles of colonialism to a
       confident, secure country inching ever closer to superpower status –
       albeit one wracked by deep and abiding fault lines.
       
       Modi, his opponents argue, has done little to soothe those divisions.
       
       Religious persecution and Islamophobia have increased sharply on his
       watch, with many accusing the prime minister of tacitly endorsing
       sectarianism as a means of further bolstering his Hindu-nationalist
       credentials, while diverting from policy failures – such as youth
       unemployment, which now stands at close to 50% among 20- to
       24-year-olds.
       
       Among India’s minorities, particularly the country’s 230 million
       Muslims, the prospect of another five-years for a prime minister who
       calls himself the “chowkidar” – or watchman – remains deeply
       concerning.
       
       Many don’t believe Modi is watching out for them – instead, they
       say they are marginalized as he fulfills his party’s dream of
       transforming secular, pluralistic India into a majoritarian Hindu
       state.
       
       “As he goes toward seeking a third term, Prime Minister Modi has
       positioned himself as a head priest alongside the head of the political
       system … the protector of the nation (and), as the creator of a
       Hindu-first nation,” said Saba Naqvi, author of “The Saffron Storm:
       From Vajpayee to Modi.”
       
       This seemingly potent, populist mix of economic empowerment and Hindu
       nationalism has proved to be a successful electoral formula for Modi,
       confounding longstanding social and regional voting lines.
       
       According to 2023 , about eight-in-ten Indian adults have a favorable
       view of Modi, including 55% who have a very favorable view. Such
       levels of popularity for a two-term incumbent prime minister defy all
       modern conventions, both in India and throughout much of the democratic
       world.
       
       “He’s done something which has not happened before in Indian
       politics among all our prime ministers,” said Naqvi. “He has
       willfully created a cult of his own personality.”
       
       ‘Many people think he is God’
       
       As the sun sets across the Ganges, Hindu devotees bathe in the holy
       river’s waters and priests offer daily prayer by its banks. It’s
       here, in the city of Varanasi – Modi’s own constituency – that
       this so-called cult of personality is on full display.
       
       Billboards with the prime minister’s face appear on the corners of
       roads, and saffron flags with his party’s lotus symbol are hoisted on
       buildings across the dusty, meandering gulleys of the ancient city.
       
       On the streets, his party’s volunteers go door-to-door advocating for
       the leader.
       
       When Modi first ran for prime minister a decade ago, he did so on a
       promise of infrastructure, development and anti-corruption, choosing
       the city of gods as his constituency – its religious symbolism the
       perfect backdrop for his BJP’s Hindu nationalist ambitions.
       
       In one of Varanasi’s oldest spice markets, shopkeepers say their
       lives have been transformed since.
       
       “Many people think he is God,” said father of two, Akash Jaiswal,
       pointing to Modi’s welfare schemes and business incentives.
       “We’ve never had a prime minister like Modi ever. He’s done a
       great sacrifice for India, for us … We want him to be prime minister
       forever.”
       
       Jaiswal even praised some of Modi’s most controversial leadership
       moments. “India had the least casualties during Covid,” he said,
       when in fact the country had the third highest number of
       pandemic-related deaths, after the United States and Brazil, according
       to the World Health Organization. Modi was for his handling of the
       pandemic and accused of being underprepared, as hospitals reached their
       limit and morgues overflowed with bodies.
       
       The city’s BJP President, Dileep Patel, who has helped Modi with all
       three of his election campaigns, however, isn’t surprised by his
       enduring levels of popularity. To him, Modi represents India’s
       future.
       
       “Today India is strong, capable, and self-reliant under the prime
       minister’s leadership,” he said.
       
       Son of a teaseller
       
       Modi’s official party biography tells the story of a poor boy, the
       third of six children, whose father was a “chaiwallah” or tea
       seller, who’d serve customers at the local train station to support
       his young family.
       
       Promoted by the BJP, analysts say this tale of humble beginnings makes
       him relatable to hundreds of millions across the country. And it stands
       in stark contrast to the generations of India’s elite, urbane
       politicians that have historically risen to the top job.
       
       “He comes from a poor background and that helps him understands the
       people of India,” said Varanasi BJP president Patel.
       
       India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, was a member of the ,
       a political party that was pivotal in ending nearly 200 years of
       British colonial rule. His daughter, Indira Gandhi, also became prime
       minister, as did her son, Rajiv. All three studied overseas at
       Cambridge or Oxford.
       
       The face of today’s Congress Party, and Modi’s primary opponent, is
       Rahul Gandhi, son of Rajiv, and an alumni of both Cambridge and
       Harvard.
       
       Modi, by contrast, had a modest upbringing in the small town of
       Vadnagar, far from the political cut and thrust of the capital New
       Delhi, according to Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay, author of “Narendra Modi:
       The Man, The Times.”
       
       Mukhopadhyay notes Modi was an average student at school and his
       marriage was arranged to a woman at 17.
       
       Though Mukhopadhyay claims the tale of Modi’s poverty is “grossly
       exaggerated,” his charisma – and confidence – was evident from an
       early age.
       
       “He liked acting in school plays,” said Mukhopadhyay. “He always
       wanted to have the lead role. If the lead role was not given to him, he
       would not act in the play at all.”
       
       Modi was still a child when he was exposed to the idea of Hindu
       nationalism through classes at the local branch of the Rashtriya
       Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing paramilitary organization that
       advocates for the establishment of Hindu hegemony within India.
       
       Founded in 1925 by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, a campaigner who had split
       from Nehru’s Congress party over what he believed to be its central
       mission is to according to the group’s website.
       
       At 17, Modi abandoned his family and his wife, left his village and
       traversed India with the group in search of a spiritual awakening,
       according to his biography. He devoted himself to the RSS, never
       remarried and learned to “leave all the pleasures in life,”
       according to an interview he gave in 2019.
       
       By 1972, he had become a “pracharak” for the RSS, according to his
       biography, someone appointed to spread their cause through meetings and
       public lectures.
       
       The turning point for the young activist came in 1975, when then Prime
       Minister Indira Gandhi invoked what she called necessary “shock
       treatment” to stamp out internal unrest. She imposed a state of
       emergency, tightening government control, rounding up critics,
       censoring her opposition and silencing the press.
       
       Detached from the demands of marriage, Modi then 25, saw an
       opportunity, according to his biography. He joined a movement to
       restore democracy to India, his profile states, marking the start of
       his journey to political high office.
       
       And in the absence of a family life, many of his supporters have
       claimed him as part of their own, adding to his everyman appeal.
       “Modi is our family,” said the shopkeeper Jaiswal in Varanasi.
       “We are all his family.”
       
       Entry into the BJP
       
       Modi joined the BJP in 1987, when the fringe political party started
       gaining traction fueled by the rise of Hindu nationalism in India.
       
       Considered to be the political arm of the RSS, the BJP gained
       prominence that decade when it advocated for the , a 16th-century
       mosque believed by Hindus to have been built on the site of the
       birthplace of the religion’s revered Lord Ram.
       
       And it was thrust into the mainstream in 1992, when – spurred on by
       members of the BJP – Hindu hardliners attacked the mosque, ripping it
       apart with their hands, and setting off a wave of sectarian violence
       that reverberated through the nation.
       
       One of the BJP’s founders Lal Krishna Advani – widely believed to
       be the brains behind the mosque’s destruction – saw a leader in
       Modi, giving him immense responsibilities within the party.
       
       No politician “brings the experience that Modi does,” Naqvi, the
       author, said last month from her home in New Delhi, referring to his
       various political roles.
       
       Modi thrived under Advani’s guidance, working his way through the
       ranks of the BJP. In 2001, he was appointed chief minister of the
       wealthy state of Gujarat.
       
       Under Modi’s governance, the state introduced a wave of
       infrastructure, industry, and innovation to its arid landscape –
       making the “Gujarat model” synonymous with development and
       government efficiency.
       
       His tenure was not without controversy.
       
       Violence erupted in Gujarat in 2002 when Hindus blamed Muslims for
       setting fire to a train in an incident that killed dozens of Hindu
       pilgrims and sought revenge by attacking Muslim-owned homes and stores.
       
       More than 1,000 people – mostly Muslims – were killed, according to
       government figures. Critics accused Modi of being complicit in the
       violence, alleging that his administration failed to prevent or
       adequately respond to the unrest.
       
       Modi faced international repercussions in its aftermath, with the
       United States banning him from entering the country for many years over
       concerns about human rights violations.
       
       He vehemently denied any wrongdoing, and the Supreme Court cleared him
       of complicity. Months after the violence, he was re-elected with a
       roaring majority – the “first evidence” of his cult following,
       said Naqvi, the author.
       
       But the polarization of communities deeply divided the nation, .
       
       Political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot suggested events in Gujarat
       made Hindu nationalists more confident. “But Modi himself is so
       insecure, he cannot face any questions,” he said.
       
       Modi infamously walked out of an interview in 2007, when journalist
       Karan Thapar pressed him on his role in the Gujarat riots. He rarely
       gives interviews, and has not held a solo press conference since
       becoming Prime Minister.
       
       “He cannot face debate,” Jaffrelot said.
       
       Becoming prime minister
       
       Modi’s “Gujarat model” had become a blueprint for India and in
       2014, the BJP won by a landslide, crushing the Congress – the
       party’s worst defeat in more than 100 years of its existence.
       
       Since entering into office, Modi’s administration has upgraded the
       country’s aging transport network, building highways connecting small
       villages with major cities. His administration has built new power
       plants and maritime projects, and, according to recent remarks from
       Modi himself, subsidized the construction of some 40 million concrete
       homes for improvised families.
       
       The administration also bolstered the country’s military
       capabilities. And it’s invested money in sports, science and high-end
       technology – letting India thrive on the world stage.
       
       But for some observers, a troubling pattern has also emerged.
       
       “He was able to popularize Hindu nationalistic politics and their
       ideology,” said Mukhopadhyay, the writer and unofficial Modi
       biographer.
       
       Modi to top positions in government, giving them the power to make ,
       instilling a among the 230 million Muslims living in the country.
       
       In 2019, he roared through polls yet again – this time on a more
       clearly defined ticket of Hindu supremacy.
       
       He abrogated the special autonomy of Kashmir – India’s only
       Muslim-majority state – bringing it under the direct control of New
       Delhi. His government implemented a controversial citizenship law
       considered by many to be discriminatory against Muslims.
       
       He built the Ram Temple in Ayodhya on the site of the destroyed mosque,
       of 1992’s bloodshed for many Muslims, but brought a for millions of
       Hindu devotees.
       
       And to his more vocal critics, Modi’s economic policies are also open
       to question. Despite India now boasting an economy that is projected to
       grow 7.3% this fiscal year – the highest rate among major global
       economies – accusations persist that Modi has failed to create enough
       jobs, or adequately bridge the gap between the country’s billionaire
       class and its most impoverished.
       
       “He has made the poor, poorer. He has increased inequalities,” said
       Jaffrelot, in reference to the country’s wealth gap, which according
       to a is more unequal than it was during British rule.
       
       On the diplomatic front, he’s grown , been  and courted by the
       United Kingdom.
       
       At the same time, Modi has kept India’s historically close
       relationship with Russia — snapping up huge amounts of Moscow’s oil
       despite the Ukraine invasion — and he maintains relations with both
       Israel and other Middle Eastern countries at a time of increased
       polarization.
       
       And an overwhelming majority of Indians appear to put their weight
       behind his leadership. A recent Morning Consult poll ranked Modi as the
       world’s most popular global leader, with an approval rating of 76%
       at home.
       
       “He’s the number one figure right now. He’s the only candidate
       for prime minister,” Naqvi said.
       
       At a Modi rally in the northern city of Ghaziabad earlier this month,
       thousands of supporters thronged the large grounds as he walked on
       stage. Some dressed as the Indian god Ram, others head to toe in
       saffron, the official color of his BJP, their triumphant cries
       reverberating through the air.
       
       In the city of Meerut in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, a Modi
       supporter says she is voting for him because he is “unlike any other
       politician in the world.”
       
       “I have put Modi’s poster in my son’s room,” Raniva, who is 36
       and goes by one name, said. “The way (he) is doing so much for the
       country, I hope my son also does good work for the country.”
       
       On the streets of the capital New Delhi, opinion is more divided.
       “Nowadays there is so much fighting between Hindus and Muslims. We
       all know why,” said one rickshaw driver sitting outside the city’s
       famed Jama Mosque.
       
       With Modi widely expected to comfortably win the upcoming election,
       some analysts say they have genuine fears about the future of the
       country’s democracy.
       
       “I definitely see a decline in the quality of democracy in the
       country,” said Mukhopadhyay. “I see greater insecurity and
       marginalization of Muslims in India. That’s not a very rosy picture.
       But it’s the likely path India is going to take.”
       
   DIR  <- back to index